Legal & Policy
Unique Challenges in Elected Governing Bodies for FOSS
January 31, 2026
5:00 PM – 6:00 PM Add to calendar
5:00 PM – 6:00 PM Add to calendar
UB5.230
<p>FOSS communities have historically developed governance models that include within them biases and other problems, often belatedly recognized. For example, there is now general agreement that no dictator can be benevolent. Common alternatives to the "benevolent" dictator— the "meritocracy", "do-acracy", and the self-perpetuating committee — also have serious problems. Often the alternative offered to these kinds of governance systems is for some kind of elected governance body.</p>
<p>Democratic governance institutions are messy, however. We'll consider some historical examples of problems that have occurred in various democratic FOSS initiatives and organizations, and will focus particularly on the Open Source Initiative (OSI) board of directors elections of 2025. We'll consider the question: how can we design elected governance bodies for FOSS that truly represent the views of our community and are held properly accountable to their constituencies?</p>
<p>Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier will moderate this panel, and additional individuals have been invited and will be added once they are confirmed.</p>
Additional information
| Live Stream | https://live.fosdem.org/watch/ub5230 |
|---|---|
| Type | devroom |
| Language | English |
More sessions
| 1/31/26 |
<p>DevRoom organisers welcome all to the Legal & Policy Issues DevRoom</p>
|
| 1/31/26 |
<p>Legal and licensing issues are a vital part of the Free Software ecosystem. While many Free Software developers may have a good idea of the legal and licensing requirements that turn their project into Free Software, there are many more attending FOSDEM who may lack the knowledge or have misconceptions about the legal issues in Free Software.</p> <p>This session hopes to provide an introduction and background to the legal concepts that underpin the freedoms in Free Software, and how the law ...
|
| 1/31/26 |
<p>Open protocols underpin much of Europe’s digital infrastructure, yet they remain a blind spot in European digital policy. This talk highlights why supporting open protocol governance is crucial for Europe’s digital sovereignty, interoperability, and innovation. It explores how policymakers and developers can together address this gap by recognising protocols as foundational infrastructure and shaping policies that enable resilient, interoperable, and decentralised systems.</p>
|
| 1/31/26 |
<p>In 2020 the Dutch government adopted the 'open, unless' principle, promoting the use and procurement of open source software, unless impossible. But what happens after such a policy is published? This isn’t as straightforward as we’d think. Within government projects, we still regularly need to answer practical questions such as “are we allowed to build or buy this? Are we allowed or required to publish our code? What do we need security wise? What do our procurement policies say? Where ...
|
| 1/31/26 |
<p>Open source initiatives usually bubble up from the grassroots community, and while governments have been paying more attention recently, policy is often subject to the whims of election cycles. This means long-term continuity is never guaranteed.</p> <p>Even when policies are in place, their implementation can be hampered by two significant factors: civil servants' open-source literacy and existing legal/regulatory bottlenecks. Sure, enshrining open source into law would make it mandatory and ...
|
| 1/31/26 |
<p>In this Q&A session we will address all the questions our audience might have on the CRA in relation to Free Software. We will kick of the session with a short introduction focussing on current challenges around the implementation of the CRA with a specific focus on Open Source Stewards and Attestation programs and how and where financial support is needed in order to make the CRA work.</p>
|
| 1/31/26 |
<p>Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) sued Vizio in October 2021 because Vizio did not provide the required source code for the GPL and LGPL works that Vizio chose to use in its TVs, preventing SFC from making privacy and security enhancing changes, among other improvements that the GPL and LGPL require that companies allow in devices they sell. SFC brought the case as a third-party beneficiary of these copyleft agreements, to demonstrate how users of copylefted software can directly enforce the ...
|
