MCH2022 Curated content

Freedom, Ownership, Infrastructure, and Hope

Abacus 🧮
Eleanor Saitta
How should we live together? How do we make a complex, interdependent, infrastructural society less exploitive? In this talk, we'll try to frame questions, if not answers, grounded in the context of the political changes required to mitigate and survive climate change, global fascism, and hypercapitalism.
This talk starts from two threads. First, the common understanding of "freedom" derives from the institution of slavery. Looking at alternate definitions provides the foundation for rethinking the building blocks of society and human interaction. Second, climate change represents an immediate existential threat to human civilization, but mitigating it is no longer a question of technology — only of collective will. If we insist on maintaining existing structures of ownership and inequality, we significantly reduce our chance of survival. However, these questions of freedom, ownership, and equity aren't just political questions, they're directly encoded in the infrastructure we all rely on to survive — that same infrastructure that we currently need to replace, almost wholesale. In reality, any path to survival will imply a muddle of adaptation, mitigation, replacement, and elimination, both of infrastructural components and of elements of the social contract and its governance systems. Harm reduction is more important and more probable than ideologically perfect revolutions (or even evolutions). However, plausible visions of the future are a critical ingredient for the hope we need to continue the work, and will also directly shape that work. Most folks who live in ownership societies (almost everyone, now) find the idea of moving away from an ownership model terrifying, because it means giving up those things that give them a sense of security. Understanding the emotional interiority of life in a post-ownership society can change that, and understanding the dynamics of different freedoms can help us understand how we might get there. As people who build infrastructure, we can play with the social models our infrastructure encodes — and have been doing so for decades. Likewise, we can (and have been) rebuilding pieces of the social contracts that shape our personal lives. This talk aims to leave you with new questions and new directions for that work.

Additional information

Type Talk
Language English

More sessions

7/22/22
MCH2022 Curated content
Elger "Stitch" Jonker
Abacus 🧮
⚠️ Warning! This talk may contain hackers. There may be hackers in the room. There may be hackers surrounding the room. There may be hackers recording this. There may be hackers listening in. There may be hackers that exfiltrate data. There may be hackers wearing shirts. There may be hackers carrying spying devices. OH NO! There are hackers EVERYWHERE! What can we do now, except having a party?
7/22/22
MCH2022 Curated content
Jelle vd ster
Abacus 🧮
What do big tech, synthesizers, the crucifixion and Matthäus Passion have in common? Find the answer in the tech performance The Silicon Passion. We’ve all embraced big tech —but is it a warm hug or a strangulation? Bear witness to a debate of biblical proportions between tech nerds, technology and its users. In The Silicon Passion SETUP, in collaboration with de Transmissie (David Schwarz en Derk Stenvers) and Rodrigo Ferreira, is looking for a way out of the pit that technology has ...
7/22/22
MCH2022 Curated content
Clairvoyance 🔮
Lightning talks are a 5 to 10 minute quick talk on an interesting subject. They can be with or without slides, and with or without proper preparation. if you weren't accepted in the main CfP, this is also a great opportunity to give an abridged version of your talk. These sessions will be available to sign up to later on, with details on the wiki.
7/22/22
MCH2022 Curated content
Mikko Hypponen
Abacus 🧮
This is a submission for a keynote talk at MCH2022. The Internet is both a familiar, comfortable place as well as a bottomless rabbit hole you can lose yourself in. The Internet has always been like this from its inception, the difference now is the scale and consequences are almost immeasurable - and it tests the limits of human imagination. When you look into the mirror of the Internet what you see reflected back depends on what you are looking for. It has become largely a reflection of ...
7/22/22
MCH2022 Curated content
Battery 🔋
Thanks to DNSSEC and DANE, it is possible to automatically verify user@domain.name identities by checking with domain.name servers. The real problem however, is integration with existing protocols, instead of inventing something completely new and perhaps web-only. The purpose of our work on Realm Crossover mechanisms has been to design generic solutions that extend many different application protocols, without changing their protocol specs.
7/22/22
MCH2022 Curated content
Klaus Agnoletti
Clairvoyance 🔮
Utilizing collaborative security to collect data on attacks we were able to detect Log4J in a quite unusual but effective manner. We'll show you how CrowdSec enables the entire infosec community to stand together by detecting attempts to exploit a critical 0day, reporting them centrally thereby enabling anyone to protect themselves shortly after the vulnerability was made public. The unusual part is that this is done using FOSS software and by analyzing logs of real production systems but in a ...
7/22/22
MCH2022 Curated content
bert hubert
Abacus 🧮
Building on the very well attended DNA presentations ("DNA: The Code Of Life") at SHA2017, this talk will cover: * A brief recap what DNA is and how it works * It is surprisingly digital! * How reading DNA is within 'pro-sumer' reach now * (I might bring a live demo for after the talk) * An overview of DNA editing technologies (offline, and online: on living organisms) * Including the famous CRISPR-CAS, but also newer variants * How does such editing actually work in a lab? * The surprising lack ...