Session
Fahrplan - Hauptprogramm 36C3
Ethics, Society & Politics

#NoPNR – Let’s kill the next Data Retention Law

How to Stop the Dubious Use of Passenger Name Records by Law Enforcement
The talk will address how passenger name records (PNR) of flight passengers are currently used by law enforcement throughout the European Union to track and identify suspects of a variety of crimes, how this is likely to be only a first step by the security state to surveil our every movement. Two NGOs have joined forces to stop this new form of indiscriminate mass surveillance in the courts and build safeguards against future infringements of our fundamental right to privacy.

The PNR directive obliges all EU member states to process and save for five years all PNR data of passengers entering or exiting the European Union by plane. All member states have agreed to voluntarily extend this practice to all intra-EU flights as well. Subsequently, the data of hundreds of millions flight passengers are being checked against databases, generating vast amounts of false positives and futile infringements on passengers’ right to privacy. The data are also processed against “pre-determined criteria” which allows law enforcement to define “suspicious flight patterns”. The goal of this profiling of our travel movements is to find suspects among flight passengers that the authorities have never even heard of before. The system has no effective safeguards to prevent vast numbers of people from being falsely labeled as potential terrorists.

Member states are already planning to extend this practice to international buses, trains and ferries – even though the effectiveness of processing flight passengers’ PNR data has yet to be proven. By this logic, the next step would be to track rental cars, then all cars, then mobile phones, and finally getting rid of the criterion “international”, enabling the state to surveil our every movement and to identify those of us who seemingly move around in suspicious patterns.

But there is hope. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has proven before to be critical of indiscriminate mass surveillance affecting people that are not even on the authorities’ radar yet. Therefore, the Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte, a German NGO focused on strategic litigation, and epicenter.works, an Austrian NGO focused on protecting human rights in the digital age, have started legal proceedings against the PNR directive, aiming to have German and/or Austrian courts ask the CJEU whether the PNR directive and national transposition laws violate the Charta of Fundamental Rights.

This talk will explain how law enforcement currently processes PNR data, how this violates fundamental rights, how these surveillance systems may soon extended to other means of transportation, and what strategy civil society is pursuing to stop this from happening.

Additional information

Type lecture
Language English

More sessions

12/27/19
Ethics, Society & Politics
Borg
Katastrophen, Krisen & Kriege lassen sich heute live mitverfolgen. Wir erleben eine kaum überblickbare Quellendiversität in den sozialen Medien – jeder wird zur Quelle. Welchen Einfluss hat das darauf, wie ein Konflikt wahrgenommen wird, wie setzen Konfliktparteien aber auch Helfende die sozialen Medien ein und was bedeutet das für Diejenigen, die vor Ort humanitäre Hilfe leisten. Wir diskutieren dies anhand des türkischen Überfalls auf Nord-Ost-Syrien gemeinsam mit Fee Baumann von Heyva ...
12/27/19
Ethics, Society & Politics
Borg
Ein von Zeit Online entwickeltes Tool macht es möglich, die Plenarprotokolle des Bundestags grafisch und inhaltlich auszuwerten, und zwar seit seiner ersten Sitzung 1949 bis heute. In den 200 Millionen Wörtern zeigen sich historische Zäsuren, sie machen gesellschaftliche und sprachliche Entwicklungen sichtbar: Wie ernst nahm der Bundestag in den vergangenen Jahren den Klimawandel? Wie häufig redeten die Abgeordneten über Datenschutz, über Arbeitslosigkeit, über Rechtsextremismus, über ...
12/27/19
Ethics, Society & Politics
Henryk Plötz
Dijkstra
Seit dem 14. November ist die letzte Schonfrist zur Umsetzung der Europäischen Richtline 2015/2366 über Zahlungsdienste im Binnenmarkt (neudeutsch PSD2) verstrichen. Das hat erst vielen Banken viel Arbeit gemacht, und macht jetzt vielen Kunden viel Ärger. Warum eigentlich?
12/27/19
Ethics, Society & Politics
Sasha
Eliza
Over the past 2 years we've been building delivery robots - at first thought to be autonomous. We slowly came to the realization that it's not something we could easily do; but only after a few accidents, fires and pr disasters.
12/27/19
Ethics, Society & Politics
Constanze Kurz
Ada
Der Europäische Menschenrechtsgerichtshof beschäftigt sich nun schon seit Jahren mit der Frage, ob die durch Edward Snowden öffentlich bekanntgewordene geheimdienstliche Massenüberwachung mit der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention kompatibel ist. Wie ist der Stand der Dinge?
12/27/19
Ethics, Society & Politics
Clarke
Die sogenannten digitalen Assistenzsysteme des BAMF, „intelligente Grenzen“ in der EU und immer größer werdende Datenbanken: Wer ins Land kommt und bleiben darf, wird immer mehr von IT-Systemen bestimmt. Davon profitiert die Überwachungsindustrie, während Menschen von automatisierten Entscheidungen abhängig werden.
12/27/19
Ethics, Society & Politics
Katharin Tai
Ada
The people of Hong Kong have been using unique tactics, novel uses of technology, and a constantly adapting toolset in their fight to maintain their distinctiveness from China since early June. Numerous anonymous interviews with protesters from front liners to middle class supporters and left wing activists reveal a movement that has been unfairly simplified in international reporting. The groundbreaking reality is less visible because it must be - obfuscation and anonymity are key security ...