Ethics, Society & Politics

No Love for the US Gov.

Why Lauri Love’s case is even more important than you thought
Lauri Love has never set foot in the United States, yet he is facing a potential century in jail if extradited for his alleged involvement in #OpLastResort, an Anonymous-related protest action that occurred in response to the death of Aaron Swartz.
The case against Love, a Finnish and UK citizen, has profound implications for United States claims of global jurisdiction over the internet, for the treatment of neurodivergent individuals under the law, and for privacy rights in the UK and beyond. Lauri has been involved in two important legal cases this year. In May, Lauri scored a rare victory for digital rights in the UK, ensuring the National Crime Agency did not establish a dangerous new precedent to compel the decryption of stored data. Then this summer, during his extradition hearings, a significant portion of defense testimony related to Love’s diagnosis with Aspergers syndrome, his depression and long-term health symptoms for which he is under medical observation. Expert testimony reinforced the inadequacy, violence and injustice of the U.S. prison system for dealing with these concerns. This September, a judge agreed that Lauri was at serious risk of self-harm, yet she approved his extradition nonetheless, reopening a debate in the UK over how to protect vulnerable individuals that was ostensibly resolved after Gary McKinnon’s extradition was blocked by Theresa May in 2012. Ex-Lulzsec member Jake Davis – who was indicted in the United States but prosecuted in the UK, will give his take on Lauri’s case and its broader ramifications. Lauri himself will also participate via video link. How does the possibility of Lauri’s extradition change the threat landscape for digital activists? Is there any way to prevent extradition being used as a tool of US global jurisdiction over the internet? Where has the law on both sides of the Atlantic failed Lauri, and what are the changes we should be fighting for?

Additional information

Type lecture
Language English

More sessions

12/27/16
Ethics, Society & Politics
Cian Westmoreland
Saal 1
As they say in the Air Force, ‚No comms no bombs‘, – A technician’s insight into the invisible networks governing military drones and the quest for accountability
12/27/16
Ethics, Society & Politics
Kurt Opsahl
Saal 1
Both strong end-to-end communications encryption and device encryption are legal in most jurisdictions today, and remain widely available. Yet software programmers and hardware producers are increasingly under pressure from law enforcement and policy makers around the world to include so-called backdoors in encryption products.
12/27/16
Ethics, Society & Politics
RA Ulrich Kerner
Saal 2
Polizeibehörden und Geheimdienste sammeln Daten der Bürger – mehr als je zuvor. Der Bestand an unterschiedlichen Datenbanken ist enorm gewachsen und geradezu unübersichtlich geworden. Aufgrund datenschutzrechtlicher Regelungen gibt es für etliche dieser Datenbanken einen gesetzlichen Auskunftsanspruch des Bürgers.
12/27/16
Ethics, Society & Politics
Joseph Cox
Saal 1
In early 2015, the Federal Bureau of Investigation hacked computers in Austria, Denmark, Chile, Colombia, Greece, and likely the United Kingdom and Turkey too. In all, the agency used a Tor Browser exploit to target over 4000 computers spread across the world based on a single, arguably illegal warrant.
12/27/16
Ethics, Society & Politics
Erik
Saal 2
This talk presents the results of the technical analysis for the German Parliamentary Committee investigating the NSA spying scandal on geolocation methods in mobile networks.
12/27/16
Ethics, Society & Politics
Max Mehl
Saal G
Nach drei Jahren wurde endlich die nutzerunfreundliche Praxis des Routerzwangs („Compulsory Routers“) gesetzlich für unzulässig erklärt, und aktuell treibt uns die EU-Funkabschottung („Radio Lockdown Directive“) um. Um was geht es dabei? Und was können wir daraus für andere Fälle lernen?
12/27/16
Ethics, Society & Politics
Saal 2
After three years the EU has for the first time new Net Neutrality rules. What do they mean in practice? Which commercial practices by ISPs are allowed and which have to be punished by the telecom regulator. We give an overview about three years of campaign and where we go from here.