Freedom
Is the Open door closing?
Past 15 years review and a glimpse into the future.
"Open Source" has been wildly successful, no doubt.
Yet, in recent years, we have seen a massive amount of failed 'open' projects.
Why is that?
I have identified 10
scenarios in which the 'Open' approach works. But what is most interesting, is that those scenarios have enabling conditions, and while those conditions are taken for granted, they are not.
Not every 'Open' project is sustainable. Not every project is worth adopting or contributing to.
During the presentation, we will look into what works and why, and what to expect from different 'Open' initiatives. We will cover almost everything that can be open - starting from hardware, through software, education, and we will end up covering Open Governments.
Each sector is different, and for some of them, the 'Open' approach will not work. Come and see what I have found out in this space during my research, and evaluate whether you are working on the right project.
Because the only resource you will never get back is time.
If you are using or contributing to a software projects, especially on your own, you certainly want to know whether your project has a chance of slipping into oblivion.
Described scenarios will not only help you to answer that question, but will also help you to figure out what is most important for your project, right now.
The scenarios that will be covered include:
Open Hardware - DIY movements, when 'Open' is used quite cunningly to explore possibilities.
Open Hardware - farming and ecology - a noble idea which is deeply flawed because it does not take into account basic economic rules.
Open Content - beneficial to many people and organisation, but not necessarily for content creators.
Open Education - yet another great idea, which has a hidden catch that makes or breaks it, depending on how the idea is executed.
Open Access & Science - a rebellion against corporations that slow down the growth of humanity.
Open Collaboration - projects run in this spirit let us advance knowledge and technical capabilities, but they do not promise financial returns.
Bypass high cost of adoption - the idea that you can use software without going through a 3 months approval process was appealing in 1990. But today... that business model is going away thanks to the security folks.
Open as a marketing tool - if it has 'Open' in the name, it is not open.
Open Pet Projects - that deserves only mention, because there are so many such projects, but almost none of them is sustainable.
Open Legislations and Governments - a futile attempt to increase transparency
Open Data - very difficult to monetise, increasingly dangerous to consume
Open Standards - a lot of legal uncertainties
Additional information
| Type | maintrack |
|---|
More sessions
| 2/1/20 |
Amanda is the chair of the United Nations Technology and Innovation Labs' Open source and IP Advisory Board and will give an overview of the work being done by the labs and take the audience through a couple of case studies using data and blockchain for good in an open way.
|
| 2/2/20 |
Whether it is "Open Core", the Mongo SSPL or the Common Clause, the core ethos of open source has been under attack for some time. As those parties who seek to limit the promise of free software enjoys more and more success, the community will need stronger and more forceful tools to defend ourselves. Presenters: Michael Cheng (Facebook), Max Sills (Google), Chris Aniszczyk (Linux Foundation)
|
| 2/2/20 |
If you are a Free Software (Open Source Software) developer, do you have to follow an open development model or a certain business model? Do you have to believe in or be a supporter of socialism, capitalism, or liberalism? Do we, when we work for software freedom, have to agree on certain positions on privacy, intelligence services, the military, the climate catastrophe, nuclear power, vaccinations, or animal rights? Or should we accept to have different views or even allow each other not to ...
|
| 2/2/20 |
A lot of open source developers choose to deploy their software on infrastructure based on proprietary software. Behind this apparent paradox is the need to adapt to changing environments, adopt new technologies fast, and use increasing amounts of computing power. Open infrastructure (computing, networking and storage infrastructure based on open source software) has a lot to offer, but it's easy to overlook if you don't take the time to take a step back and analyze the situation rationally. In ...
|
| 2/2/20 |
In the past few years we saw a lot of discussions around free software licenses and why they are bad for companies. This talk debunks this claim and shows how free software licenses are actually great for startups if done right.
|
| 2/2/20 |
Karen and Bradley, building on the substantial feedback from last year's keynote, follow up their 2019 FOSDEM keynote with real-world suggestions, ideas, and discussion about how we, as software freedom activists, can live in a world with so much proprietary software. Software freedom is hard to find, but we can find it together, and we can support each other when we must face the proprietary software world and make hard decisions. Let's figure it out together and support each other!
|
| 2/2/20 |
Linux mobile software and GNU/Linux distributions are currently not widely available for smartphones. This talk covers why it is desirable to have GNU/Linux (not: Android or Android-based) on your smartphone, what the current state of various software attempts at Linux on smartphones is, what progress has been made, and will also dive into the available old and new hardware (including the PinePhone and Librem 5) to run the software & distributions on.
|
