Technologie & Wissenschaft

Improving the Working Practices of Humans in the Loop of Artificial Intelligence - An Experimental Study with Online Image Curators

Oberhafenkantine
Fabian Stephany, Johann Laux
AI technologies, like Chat GPT or Dall-E, require human curation of eradicating violent, racist or non-functional content from recognition or recommendation systems. But which features determine the output of "humans in the loop"? Our study shows that precise rules and better pay significantly improve the performance of human oversight.
In January 2023, a Time article by Billy Perrigo revealed that OpenAI used Kenyan online workers to make ChatGPT less toxic. The investigation shows that thousands of human curators were needed to erase hateful, racist, and violent content from the AI Chatbot system often under questionable working conditions. This journalistic contribution spotlights a practise that has become standard in the globalised supply chain of AI tools; the role of so-called "humans in the loop" (HITL) curating text or images that would then fuel natural-language or image processing tool, which we all use on a daily basis. Acknowledging that AI tools will in the near future continue to rely on human curation, the investigation furthermore sparked a discussion on the "adequate" working conditions of the micro-task workers, which is the starting point of our study presented here. Our work investigates the effects of different types of instructions on the accuracy of image classification tasks performed by content moderators from online labour markets. Specifically, we conducted an A/B test of classifying images under rules, incomplete rules, or standards and different payment structures for 300 online workers. To account for participants' varying backgrounds and experience levels, we survey them as to their educational and occupational background and experience level. This provides valuable information for understanding to what extent factors such as skill and experience influence accuracy in image classification tasks — compared to the type of instructions given, and the present or absence of additional monetary incentives.  Apart from the immensely important normative debate on the working conditions of humans in the loop, we show that difference in instructions and higher wages actually lead to better outcomes in the human curation of AI technologies, such as image recognition software. The findings suggest that it could be in the economic interest of tech companies employing or outsourcing HITL work to provide "click-workers" with better instructions and a higher wage for their tasks. These insights will most likely become more relevant in the near future, as AI tools, such chatbots and image recognition technologies, will be more and more incorporated into the workflow routines of our economy.

Additional information

Type Vortrag
Language English

More sessions

Pending
Technologie & Wissenschaft
Mary Maggic
Wetlab
How do our bodies become-with invisible molecules, whose boundaries blur between natural and synthetic? This installation is the result of the workshop, "Worlding with the Molecular" where participants extract hormones from their own urine and build a scenography that embodies the very agency of molecules.
Pending
Technologie & Wissenschaft
Steffen Köhn, Nestor Siré
Location: Arena Club - Media Parcours FRAGILE CONNECTIONS ist eine interaktive Dokumentation des kubanischen Graswurzel-Netzwerks SNET - entstanden als Reaktion auf den stark beschränkten Internetzugang in Kuba.
Pending
Technologie & Wissenschaft
Katharina Zweig, Marc Hauer, Leon Sproten, Lea J Becker, tba, Jan Harbeke, Alexander Wilhelm, Natalia Syrnicka
Location: Glashaus Wie erkenne ich diskriminierende KI? Die Frage wirst Du Dir spätestens stellen, wenn es eine KI ist, die über Deinen Kredit entscheidet. Wir zeigen Dir anhand von Entscheidungsbäumen, dass die Antwort gar nicht so einfach ist. Du erfährst , wie Diskriminierung verschleiert werden kann, und kannst es direkt selbst versuchen!
Pending
Technologie & Wissenschaft
Sonderforschungsbereich/Transregio 318 „Constructing Explainability“ , Nils Klowait, Biere Lea, Helen Beierling , Mathis Tibbe, Tim Jonas Rittig, Arthur Maximilian Noller
KI entdecken: Kann ein Roboter mit deiner Hilfe besser Minigolf spielen? Und wie gut kommst du mit einer KI klar, von der du gar nicht weißt, was sie tut? Im Sonderforschungsbereich/Transregio 318 „Constructing Explainability“ erforschen wir, wie wir die Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion mit Erklärungen verbessern können – und du kannst uns unterstützen.
Pending
Technologie & Wissenschaft
Mike Shorter, Sabine Junginger, Aurelio Todisco, Aysun Aytaç, Paola Pierri
Money Talks is an installation that lifts the curtain on our power dynamics and financial relationships with speech recognition AI. Talk to this AI in order to understand not only what it hears, but the inner workings we never get to see. How has it interpreted you? How confident is it? What are the true costs?
Pending
Technologie & Wissenschaft
Fadia Elgharib, Daniel Wessolek, Sara Diaz Rodriguez, Natalija Krasnoperova, Spyros Libre Water, LibreWater, Tom Dietel, Bezawork Tilahun Mindaye, Sarah Prien
Makerspace
The Open Hardware Exhibition will showcase a worldwide collection of open hardware, demonstrating how open hardware can end some global challenges and offer new ways to solve these challenges. Pass by the Makerspace to get a closer look!
Pending
Technologie & Wissenschaft
Christian Zöllner
Location: Fabmobil Wie geht das eigentlich: Co Creation mit einem Roboter? Wie fühlt sich das an: Wenn ein Roboter auf Augenhöhe mitgestaltet? Mit Studierenden der Burg Giebichenstein Kunsthochschule Halle könnt ihr mit Roboterarmen zeichnen üben!