Ethics, Society & Politics

How to keep Open Source open without leaving our communities open to threats

The Four Freedoms (defined ~40 years ago) and the Four Opens (~15 years ago) for Open Source provided canonical definitions for what are the cornerstones of Open Source Software communities today. While the ethos still applies today, the cultural norms that blossomed to put it into practice are from an era with different challenges. To build a better world, we need to both keep and protect the value system of the Four Freedoms and Four Opens. To do that, we need to re-assess our risk and threat models to balance that allows beautiful minds to flourish as well as introduce responsible friction to prevent harm from coming to them.
The state of the internet, c 1990: * Limited, opt-in connectivity: people had to both have access to a computer and that computer had to have access to the internet. * Tooling required some in-industry knowledge to be able to run and use, not only for development but also for communication. * Open source was a young movement. The "common source" was proprietary. The state of the internet, c 2025: * Always online, might-not-even-be-to-opt-out connectivity: devices are almost always collecting and transmitting data, including audio/visual, in some cases even if "turned off". * Easy to use tooling has made it easier for everyone to come together. The pervasiveness of technology also means that most people, of any background, can easily access other people in the thousands or even millions. * Open source is common, accessible, and matured. A $9 **_trillion_** resource. Yes, **_trillion_**. These three significant changes drastically change the threat model for OSS communities. In the beginning, someone had to have both knowledge and resources to harm or otherwise compromise a community of developers. Now, anyone with a grudge can make a bot army with seamless integrations and gracious freemium tiers for AI/LLMs. Likewise, when open source was small, the "who" who would be motivated to harm and otherwise disrupt those communities was limited. Now there is both massive social and economic benefit to harm and disrupt. This means that risks and threats now still include the motivated and resourced **_with the addition of_** those who are scarce in both. We need to come together to build new organizational threat models that account for how this consequence has posed new risks to our communities. With care and attention to detail, we can introduce responsible friction that will protect our communication infrastructure, the lifeblood of what allows open source to grow. There will also be a workshop with this presentation, with the outcome of creating an ongoing working group dedicated to helping OSS Foundations of all sizes protect their communities.

Weitere Infos

Live Stream https://streaming.media.ccc.de/39c3/fuse
Format Talk
Sprache Englisch

Weitere Sessions

27.12.25
Ethics, Society & Politics
Katika Kühnreich
One
While the extreme right is on the rise in many countries and climate change is unrolling, a promising future seems to be written: According to Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and some other “tech bros” it is to leave the dying planet to go to space. With the help of something called “A(G)I”. But what kind of future is the one that is promised? And what is the connection between power cycles of tech company owners and people who's believes can be called fascist? As we moved power through data in ...
27.12.25
Ethics, Society & Politics
Joschi Wolf
Fuse
Das Klima-Update vom FragDenStaat Climate Helpdesk.
27.12.25
Ethics, Society & Politics
Fuse
Wer heutzutage eine Wohnung sucht, kommt kaum noch darum herum, sich einen Account bei Immoscout24 & Co. zu erstellen. Diese „Platform Real Estate“ sind eine besondere Art der „Walled Gardens“, die ihr Geschäftsmodell auf die sich immer weiter verschärfende Wohnungskrise ausgerichtet haben. Und das ist äußerst profitabel für die Besitzer dieser Strukturen der Daseinsvorsorge: Im September 2025 stieg Scout24 in den DAX auf und reiht sich damit in Unternehmen wie BMW, Rheinmetall und ...
27.12.25
Ethics, Society & Politics
Kate Sim
Ground
From the EU’s “Chat Control” to the UK’s age verification, there is a growing legislative momentum across jurisdictions to regulate the Internet in the name of protecting children. The monstrosity of child sexual abuse looms large in shaping how policymakers, advocates, and the public understand the problem area of and propose solutions for detecting, reporting, and removing harmful/illegal content. Children’s safety and adults’ privacy are thus pitted against each other, deadlocked ...
27.12.25
Ethics, Society & Politics
Manuel Hofmann
Zero
Großen Herausforderungen im Gesundheitswesen soll mittels Technik und Eigenverantwortung begegnet werden. Die Hoffnung: „KI“ und Digitalisierung machen das System effizienter; Selbstoptimierung und mehr Eigenverantwortung halten die Menschen länger gesund. Der Vortrag analysiert aktuelle Diskurse rund um Digitalisierung und Gesundheit, und fragt kritisch, wie diese Entwicklung ohnehin bestehende soziale Ungleichheiten verschärfen könnte. Am Ende bleibt die Frage: Wie könnten tragfähige ...
27.12.25
Ethics, Society & Politics
Chris Köver
Ground
Seit Anfang 2024 dürfen Ausländerbehörden Smartphones von ausreisepflichtigen Menschen nicht nur durchsuchen, sondern gleich ganz behalten – „bis zur Ausreise“. Was als geringfügige Änderung im Aufenthaltsgesetz daherkommt, erweist sich als massiver Eingriff in Grundrechte: Menschen verlieren nicht nur die Kontrolle über ihre Daten, sondern auch ihr wichtigstes Kommunikationsmittel – auf unbestimmte Zeit. Hier hört ihr, welche absurden Blüten das treibt. Von Bayern bis NRW haben ...
27.12.25
Ethics, Society & Politics
Ground
Wenn die Regierung sich nicht mehr an das eigene Recht gebunden fühlt, markiert das nicht nur einen politischen Spurwechsel, sondern die Auffahrt auf den Highway to Trumpism. Zeit die Notbremse zu ziehen! Normalerweise trifft es in solchen Situationen immer zuerst diejenigen, die sich am wenigsten wehren können. Doch was passiert, wenn genau diese Menschen mit juristischen Werkzeugen bewaffnet werden, um zurückzuschlagen? Anhand von über 100 Klagen afghanischer Schutzsuchender zeigen wir, ...